Skip to content

Socialist Review  
Search
Back issues
2013
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
   
2012
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
July
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2011
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2010
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2009
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2008
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2007
Jan
 
 
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2005
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
 
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
More back issues
Links
Search for text
Subscribe
 RSS feed
Pay in advance
By Direct Debit
Payments
Order copies
More About Us
Write to us
Book group
The magazine
The website

 

The Reader: between the lines

Letter by Dino Bressab, May 2009

I was amazed by your correspondent Berit Kuennecke's assessment of Bernhard Schlink's The Reader, which Kuennecke describes as a "very good novel" in her review of Good (Films, Socialist Review, April 2009).

Kuennecke seems unaware that, in The Reader, Schlink attempts, not too subtly it must be said, to whitewash German responsibility in the Shoah. Throughout the novel, Hanna is portrayed as feminine and beguiling, and her genocidal actions are euphemised as the fruit of ignorance and naivety. Her enormous guilt gets sidetracked during the trial by futile arguments regarding possession of a key to a church door, and the paternity of a report, while Allied aviation is implicitly blamed for the death of hundreds of innocent victims.

No one before, during or after the trial asks the obvious question, what right did she and other guards have to detain and lock up all those "prisoners"?

Hanna's illiteracy and Michael's lifelong infatuation with her simply defy credibility.

Dino Bressab
Melbourne, Australia

Comments?

Email letters@socialistreview.org.uk

Contents

Complete list for this issue

Donate

Access to this website is free - help us keep it that way. Please make a donation.

Subscribe

Letters

Get each issue
delivered - and save money
as well!